Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as being a screen to the clinical procedure

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as being a screen to the clinical procedure

Present Commentary

  • Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday celebration, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Regret on Delighted birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Lee Rudolph on Drug scientists trip up, raising meth paper to write one on LSD

We’re on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine

Nine years back this coming Saturday, on August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a web log about retractions?”

Just just exactly What is now clear into the intervening nine years is exactly what a vein that is rich are as tales of what goes on whenever one thing goes incorrect in technology. So that as we now have done on a yearly basis at the moment, we’ll review just just just what occurred within the last few year.

Share this:

Drug researchers trip up, raising paper that is meth compose one on LSD

Evidently meth is a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.

Scientists in Asia have forfeit a 2019 paper on what LSD can harm vision because they’d lifted most of the paper from a write-up which had showed up the entire year before in a journal that is different about methamphetamine.

The retracted article, “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal damage in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. In line with the article:

Share this:

Writers object as “doubtful” data doom dermatology paper

A dermatology log has retracted a 2017 article by a set of scientists in Saudi Arabia after getting a complaint that is“serious about the integrity for the information. Nevertheless the author that is first of paper forced right straight right back, saying the move ended up being unjustified.

This article, “Successful usage of mixed corticosteroids and rituximab in an individual with refractory polyarteritis that is cutaneous,” ended up being authored essaywriter by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad healthcare City in Riyadh and starred in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgical treatment. It described (with instead grisly images) the actual situation of a 25-year-old guy with serious leg ulcers that fixed after the described combination treatment.

But during the notice describes, the paper can’t be trusted:

Share this:

Kyoto University suspends author that is first of Kumamoto quake paper

The initial writer of a now-retracted paper in Science in regards to the ramifications of the lethal 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan happens to be suspended from their college position for example 12 months.

Intending Lin, of this Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, had been sanctioned by the organization for misconduct stemming from their abuse of information and plagiarism when you look at the 2016 paper:

Share this:

Sunday checks out: A sleuth whoever work has resulted in a huge selection of retractions and modifications; an “unethical, high-risk and deceptive” attention research; genetics’ high retraction price

Before we provide this week’s Weekend Reads, a concern: Do you really enjoy our weekly roundup? In that case, we’re able to actually make use of your assistance. Could you give consideration to a donation that is tax-deductible help sunday Reads, and our everyday work? Many Thanks ahead of time.

Share this:

Forensics Friday: could you flag this paper if it had been under review?

Ever wished to hone your abilities as being a medical sleuth? Now’s your opportunity.

Due to the United states Society for Biochemistry and Biology that is molecular(, that is focused on educating writers on recommendations in publishing, figure planning, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a string, Forensics Friday.

Have a look at the image below, and then simply just simply take our poll. From then on, click the link below to discover the answer that is right.

Share this:

Cock and bull tale results in retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper

The ancients possessed thing for hybrids (think pets, maybe perhaps not cars): half goat-half people, horses with peoples torsos, winged horses and lions, you obtain the image. But a chicken-cow mix wasn’t on that list … until now.

A team of researchers in Brazil has lost a paper in a journal that is veterinary attempting to reuse information from the chicken research inside their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.

The content, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes mitochondrial disorder in cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and never impact virus replication,” starred in February into the journal Veterinary Microbiology.

Share this:

‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey information make fluorosis paper a banner

A present article that provided a stark caution in regards to the dangers to young ones of fluoride when you look at the nation’s water happens to be tagged with a manifestation of concern following the publication of a unique paper which undermines the dependability regarding the initial information.

This article, “Dental fluorosis trends in US dental health studies: 1986 to 2012,” appeared in March in JDR Clinical & Translational Research, a journal that is dental. The author that is first the paper is Christopher Neurath, for the United states Environmental wellness research Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.

The article, that used data through the nationwide health insurance and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the years 2011 and 2012, reported increases that are“large severity and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back to to the mid-1980s.

In line with the scientists:

Share this:

Gravitational areas, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: exactly How did this “pure, utter nonsense” get into in a peer-reviewed log?

Sometimes, a paper arrives that is therefore revolutionary, it defies description. So as opposed to attempt to do justice to a current paper in Parasitology Research, we’ll replicate a couple of paragraphs right here:

Share this:

Leech paper nets expression of concern

A write-up claiming to uproot the evolutionary tree of leeches has gotten a manifestation of concern following a audience notified the log about possible issues with the info.

The content, “Phylogenomic analysis of the putative link that is missing reinterpretation of leech development,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press title, on June 19 for this year. In line with the writers — a worldwide group that includes scientists during the National Museum of Natural History, the new york Museum of Natural Sciences, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results:

No Comments

Post a Comment